From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 23 10:41:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E500E16A404 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:41:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97FF13C494 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:41:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost.esiee.fr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id DC0C03658BF; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:41:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from secure.esiee.fr (secure.esiee.fr [147.215.1.19]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947513658EE; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:41:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from [147.215.1.21] (lisa.esiee.fr [147.215.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bonnetf) by secure.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 058173991B; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:32:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45DEC4D9.5070709@esiee.fr> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:41:29 +0100 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <45DD84C1.70308@esiee.fr> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Transparent redirect to another interface ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:41:33 -0000 Chuck Swiger wrote: > Configuring the two interfaces with two different IP addresses is no > problem at all, presuming that these IP addresses reside in different > subnets. If both IPs reside in the same subnet, you are better off > configuring the second IP as an alias on the first interface, and using > the second NIC for some other purpose. > > You can do other things, such as using ng_fec to perform "port > trunking", or using IPFW or some other thing to manually force traffic > out of the other interface, but it's unlikely to result in much benefit. > Thanks for the infos , I'll try the port trunking if it is compatible with Cisco switches ?