From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 11:08:26 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE8B16A468 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:08:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D62613C4A6 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:08:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1093076wxd for ; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 04:08:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.71.9 with SMTP id t9mr9684702wxa.1186398504500; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 04:08:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.101? ( [67.189.230.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i11sm5700082wxd.2007.08.06.04.08.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 06 Aug 2007 04:08:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 07:08:39 -0400 To: User Questions Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <200708060655.l766tYah055101@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> References: <20070806064220.GA31573@rot26.obsecurity.org> <200708060655.l766tYah055101@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20070806070640.7F02.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.31 [en] From: Gerard Subject: Re[2]: portupgrade modifys EVERY +CONTENTS now? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: User Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:08:26 -0000 On August 06, 2007 at 02:55AM Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: [snip} > Ok. But I part of my question to people , and reason for posting it > here, is the old "Is anyone else seeing this". When/if you use portupgrade, does > it do the same for you? Or is it just something that I happened some how to inherit > on atleast 2 of my machines? I have noticed the same behavior. I have some 815 ports installed; however, I had not noticed any significant deterioration in performance. -- Gerard