From nobody Thu Sep 29 12:46:42 2022 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MdY9g4L9Zz4cn7Q; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 12:50:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com (mail-ej1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MdY9g3qd2z3ckl; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 12:50:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id 13so2581816ejn.3; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 05:50:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=U6OsiKFKWYhcyKZ2Wu8QNGuQCt3BhCHuer99vBqbpDw=; b=dlBH1lf+pCoTJKyFrofNYYBKqpL2fgL8unD+fJoNgf/szm3Q0e1+7zDMo6tEwWS6uo pi4lf0RZJsz4cTjuTPfN6N3oHK4rfKb09Jr9DOkNuXkD73qP3JG2FCadhX4VrWAkurpy av7psxAltJT6lNptRQ3mPd2UxgL3vBh09IYbzbOnzp1BRBJLjyCcY6+R3TQlX4PvDBxm 7nyMsccbsEVx1SQ01gTw2c4sfzL2i0vMXQ5kM6kLPXyBaJbvgCXiTtYR0wX5PIBhTcaJ RM7Dfa0ZN+yc2n5TiQVVFejLjusWdnIIDHD8BJIaXp9UES7YX7PAJfmDv2lQnuRR5M64 dplg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=U6OsiKFKWYhcyKZ2Wu8QNGuQCt3BhCHuer99vBqbpDw=; b=HZrNwo0eWhDZzp1OHgIGFWnNWc4/U9nqNAyM7JEcGz+Dh8CGeX+7c6V1qDq4TdmJj8 SRchQd9EAbinlGws1mfWhyszUaLTcf3fCjHzMR0A16cfeXXimgnfucTtzneMf+dJFUWL NykBSJXgi5vidyOsGuRysQxstYJhcKRJXB0qK/mOvHt6W718ZN1sLVyLHthNWhYf32GH +PvmFBtcWIbSQ+/6WnW/XrX1pStEaNve5Kibvg6yz6qf7zHZXvjYsxW04a5xNv5eMvro PuEOpm0OTFiMztBXQBWMfFhzZS86Zrdw5w06wnNUXgRbXbuWw9TSfWWNwo+nAK7k2Bz+ wcyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2etaGdJH4RhQ/Qo1Z1fFiErvYlx8pbsVut3VKsKwm/pggKOOJI XgJDai0wrJujbpdjl9Ddtqe7QWJJ7Ow/zpDLYVesrwxNgsKmng== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5Xid7xWQMODGVaF+jBR7gS8/AfHDhPXFkhzrBNe7ZrDODfx+WlenqW2t/Q2gZ9cY8qMyoa9x/k3cHCa0+OH3A= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7e83:b0:782:7c78:3828 with SMTP id qb3-20020a1709077e8300b007827c783828mr2668098ejc.7.1664455813220; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 05:50:13 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202209291218.28TCI0G0066014@gitrepo.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 14:46:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: git: 690a4c91c944 - main - sysutils/bsdebfetch: + Simple system info tool in bash To: Gleb Popov Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4MdY9g3qd2z3ckl X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 2:34 PM Gleb Popov wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 3:31 PM Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa > wrote: > > > > > > Not that I complain, but how many of these do we have now in the ports?= :-) > > > > neofetch > > onefetch > > pfetch > > screenfetch > > ufetch > > > > How different are they from each other? > > I talked a submitter out of committing another similar one because as > > he admitted, it did not add any value in terms of new features > > whatsoever. > > > > Cheers. > > But on the other hand, does it hurt? The port is NO_BUILD and NO_ARCH, > so the added load on our infrastructure is minimal. This also might > encourage the author to contribute more. Yes, the port itself is light, for sure. But it might also encourage people adding "duplicated" or forked ports without any added value. In this case, the maintainer does not maintain any other ports in the tree that I could find and I could only find three PR reported by him: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=3DNew&bug_status= =3DOpen&bug_status=3DIn%20Progress&bug_status=3DClosed&component=3DIndividu= al%20Port%28s%29&email1=3Dcontact%40shiori.com.br&emailreporter1=3D1&emailt= ype1=3Dsubstring&list_id=3D525370&product=3DPorts%20%26%20Packages&query_fo= rmat=3Dadvanced&resolution=3D--- I do not ask for this to be backed out or anything. I just wanted to point out that politely asking what this port does that any of the other *fetch ports don't, is also a valid course of action. Cheers.