From owner-freebsd-ppc Thu Jun 8 16:23:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Received: from pobox.rwwa.com (pobox.rwwa.com [216.254.75.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E54F37B959 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 16:23:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from witr@rwwa.com) Received: from rwwa.com (spooky.rwwa.com [192.124.97.13]) by pobox.rwwa.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA58251; Thu, 8 Jun 2000 19:30:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from witr@rwwa.com) Message-Id: <200006082330.TAA58251@pobox.rwwa.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Narvi Cc: freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: the abi In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 08 Jun 2000 10:51:44 +0200." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 19:24:10 -0400 From: Robert Withrow Sender: owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee said: :- 3) the EABI has the advantage of an existing toolchain with no changes required at all. Also, all you Apple people, please try to keep the needs of embedded applications in mind. I believe that embedded applications will prove to be at least as important to FreeBSD as running on apple hardware. But then I'm biased. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Withrow, R.W. Withrow Associates, Swampscott MA, witr@rwwa.COM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ppc" in the body of the message