From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Dec 27 13:06:41 1996
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id NAA08477
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 27 Dec 1996 13:06:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from edison.ebicom.net (ttsai@Edison.EbiCom.net [205.218.114.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id NAA08470
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 27 Dec 1996 13:06:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from ttsai@localhost) by edison.ebicom.net  
From: Tim Tsai <ttsai@edison.ebicom.net>
Message-Id: <199612272106.PAA02820@edison.ebicom.net>
Subject: catching SIGILL
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 15:06:36 -0600 (CST)
Receipt-To: ttsai@pobox.com
Reply-To: ttsai@pobox.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

  It appears that it's not possible to catch SIGILL on 2.1.6.  Is that
correct?  I peeked at the source and the action is set to SIG_DFL each
time.

  Just curious.  I was running "crashme" and it always core dumps on
SIGILL, which means that I usually can't run it for more than a dozen
iterations or so.

  Thanks,

  Tim