From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 19:43:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A9416A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:43:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4ED743D31 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:43:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roop.nanuwa@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id w29so7936815cwb for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:43:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.99.56 with SMTP id w56mr67005cwb; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:43:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <75f3f705040711124344dd53bd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:43:14 -0700 From: Roop Nanuwa To: Geert Hendrickx In-Reply-To: <20040711175514.GA21000@lori.mine.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1089277280.236.12.camel@Desolation> <20040708232618.531e6fd7@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <200407091324.16445.kirk@strauser.com> <20040711175514.GA21000@lori.mine.nu> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:43:29 -0000 On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:55:14 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > I don't see why. XFree86 has been offering us the best free X-server > for years. It always worked fine for me. > > And why would BSD care about a GPL-incompatible licese? > It has been providing the best X-Server for years but that does not necessarily mean it's that good. The development team, I hear, is not very welcoming of updates, fixes and suggestions. That's the main reason the x.org team split, it's so they could increase the integration of new features into the source tree at a greater pace. The X server as it stands now isn't even more feature packed than what Win98's GDI could do. I don't think anyone really cares about the licensing issue, as far as I can tell. People have an opinion on it but it hasn't driven anyone --roop