From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Thu Jan 16 03:32:20 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D5C22785B for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 03:32:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-f54.google.com (mail-ot1-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47yqWS27Y5z4P1n; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 03:32:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 66so18110810otd.9; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 19:32:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ypHWWW9ZvOfbevXbEw/iXrEDnO712hnVZg8pjoV2UII=; b=QcGvlgjaOgPbOD0Fv0UMDH4JIzq1vdsKITUcdmsNFI/eEdrIxUHNJYBMaTGZ3Y9Fi8 qZ3tnD4h2+a5BTd1ztzioZbnBdpmcIoy+bB9ZtarcRsix084xvevM2mxBg0cJngw+zRg nJ7nXeWdcHfj7mxhoVi2DqTT6IHJMzcw0+eb+YnyNgJH52eL1sqnct8qKdIjCzN8A/o9 P/HAgZ/2mfjg16c/ywTAFtCcbAUUgxVdGcTJgp4W9mALBGMktJ3nLuMJJ4FQyW9gS3vM c4iSVKt3GLkHbqN/1bY71jSehRmCw6CHlnxxqr5scY3xWM0PxPKiVLpAivzPkGD+K4Ii pyIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX+271BUf63iKMSMhZhAnPxdqepuggCgzheuiUGCPCF8IWO8CFt Xw9+rhNQdo2rmGi77Z3aFhLdKUIy X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzhRrjAU1vE+ct0aOZboPjuccQmIvuP41U7Ks9JpT2kildD8z+0ss6Qg63bzbxQOCcD0mmsHg== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6a47:: with SMTP id h7mr183157otn.244.1579145538770; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 19:32:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ot1-f43.google.com (mail-ot1-f43.google.com. [209.85.210.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u18sm7301910otq.26.2020.01.15.19.32.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 19:32:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 59so18104800otp.12; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 19:32:18 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1116:: with SMTP id w22mr438273otq.216.1579145538443; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 19:32:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202001150747.00F7lqiG071097@repo.freebsd.org> <6925a470-ccbe-1446-e55e-f0aa8b6e6387@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: cem@freebsd.org From: Conrad Meyer Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 19:32:07 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r356758 - in head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall: . scripts To: Ed Maste Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47yqWS27Y5z4P1n X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 03:32:20 -0000 On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 6:15 PM Ed Maste wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 17:55, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > It's not i386 vs amd64 that's the issue. It's the total amount of RAM. ZFS > > is perfectly happy with i386 installs with enough RAM. We'd catch most > > sub-optimal cases if we'd offer it only for systems with > ~2-4GB. > > Very good point, defaulting to UFS for <4GB and ZFS for >=4GB sounds > decent to me. I'd suggest UFS < 16 GB and ZFS >= 16 GB instead.