From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 15:10:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197A716A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:10:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF0043D49 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:10:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from security@jim-liesl.org) Received: from smtp.jim-liesl.org ([68.71.52.28]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20041027151004.XZBX18454.mta10.adelphia.net@smtp.jim-liesl.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:10:04 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.jim-liesl.org [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.jim-liesl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9DB152B2; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:10:02 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <417FBA6F.7040406@jim-liesl.org> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:10:39 -0600 From: secmgr User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marko Raiha References: <200410270027.47092.miha@ghuug.org> <1098855222.15580.81.camel@emperor> <20041027100229.GB6391@daemon.adsl.kpnqwest.fi> In-Reply-To: <20041027100229.GB6391@daemon.adsl.kpnqwest.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question on vinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:10:08 -0000 Marko Raiha wrote: >Hi, > >On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 11:33:43PM -0600, secmgr wrote: > > >>... >>when you define the subdisk, don't use the whole drive. Leave at least >>64 blocks unused. >>... >> >> > >Would you mind to tell the reason behind this rule of leaving at least >64 blocks unused? > >Regards, > > The reason is empirically derived. When I created a 7 disk raid 5 set using "len 0" or all the space available, the raid set would be corrupt after initializing. Every time. When I reserved back that extra space, no corruption. (freebsd 4.10-p3) There was a thread on this a few days ago. jim