Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 10:23:38 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: Brett Taylor <brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu>, Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, Adam Turoff <aturoff@isinet.com>, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd vs. linux and NT chart Message-ID: <36DC8F1A.6B7C3EDC@newsguy.com> References: <4.1.19990302132445.040f6d40@localhost> <4.1.19990302154522.03fb3730@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brett Glass wrote: > > Sorry, but recent releases that are used in existing mission critical systems > are NOT "dead limbs" to be sawn off within only a couple of months of > release. I can see the Linuxoids ranting now: "See? The FreeBSD team doesn't > even provide ports for a release that's less than 6 months old! So much > for their 'great ports collection.' That's the kind of support you'll get if > you use FreeBSD." I seem to recall that 2.2.8-RELEASE, which, mind you, was released *after* 3.0-RELEASE, was announced to be the last 2.2.x-RELEASE. If people didn't get a clue from that... -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "FreeBSD is Yoda, Linux is Luke Skywalker." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36DC8F1A.6B7C3EDC>