From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Sat Apr 27 13:26:21 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6A115929C3
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 27 Apr 2019 13:26:20 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)
 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256)
 (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9392485AB6;
 Sat, 27 Apr 2019 13:26:20 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org)
Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354)
 id 8555C19E3E; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 13:26:20 +0000 (UTC)
From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org>
To: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net>
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: stack protector mode differs in PCH file vs. current file:
References: <20190426232058.GA80256@www.zefox.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 15:26:14 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20190426232058.GA80256@www.zefox.net> (bob prohaska's message of
 "Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:20:58 -0700")
Message-ID: <wojf-tw95-wny@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9392485AB6
X-Spamd-Bar: --
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.94 / 15.00];
 local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.996,0];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0];
 NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.94)[-0.945,0];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:96.47.64.0/20, country:US]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 13:26:21 -0000

bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> writes:

> In trying (still) to compile www/chromium on an RPI3 running -current with
> ports at 500082 and system at 346613 portmater is stopping in (I think)
> openjdk8 with
> errorerrorerror: : errorstack protector mode differs in PCH file vs. current file: : 
> stack protector mode differs in PCH file vs. current filestack protector mode differs in PCH file vs. current file
> stack protector mode differs in PCH file vs. current file

Can't say much without full build log but it maybe a regression from
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/499897

Maybe precompiled.hpp.pch is generated with different arguments compared
to when it's included in source files. Try the following workaround:

--- java/openjdk8/Makefile.orig
+++ java/openjdk8/Makefile
@@ -203,14 +203,14 @@ CONFIGURE_ENV+=	LIBCXX="-lc++"
 .endif
 .endif
 
-# GCC is broken with PCH: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2015-March/101722.html
 .if ${COMPILER_TYPE} == gcc
 CONFIGURE_ARGS+=	--with-toolchain-type=gcc
-.if ${ARCH} == "powerpc64"
-MAKE_ARGS+=	USE_PRECOMPILED_HEADER=1
-.else
-MAKE_ARGS+=	USE_PRECOMPILED_HEADER=0
 .endif
+
+# GCC is broken with PCH: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2015-March/101722.html
+# PCH is poorly tested outside of x86
+.if ${ARCH} != "amd64" || ${COMPILER_TYPE} == gcc
+MAKE_ARGS+=	USE_PRECOMPILED_HEADER=0
 .endif
 
 .if empty(ICONV_LIB)