From owner-freebsd-isp  Thu Apr  4 06:06:05 1996
Return-Path: owner-isp
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id GAA29256
          for isp-outgoing; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 06:06:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from peg.apc.org (peg.apc.org [192.131.13.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id GAA29251
          for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 06:05:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from t0.dialup.peg.apc.org (t0.dialup.peg.apc.org [192.203.176.128]) by peg.apc.org (8.6.9/Revision: 1.12 ) with SMTP id AAA29231; Fri, 5 Apr 1996 00:07:08 +1000
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 1996 00:07:08 +1000
Message-Id: <199604041407.AAA29231@peg.apc.org>
X-Sender: lmazzon@acslink.net.au
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
From: lmazzon@acslink.net.au (Livio Mazzon)
Subject: PPP Server and proxy-arp bug...
Cc: steve@edmweb.com
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


I'm using 2.0.5 and intend to setup a PPP server.  But I note,

Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com> wrote:

>avoid the headaches of the proxy-arp bug.
>

What type of problems can I expect with the proxy-arp bug?

What is the bug?

Is it mandatory for my site (a production ISP) to change to 2.1, or is the
problem not an issue?


TIA

Livio
/--------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Livio Mazzon                             lmazzon@acslink.net.au    | 
| Mazzon Systems Engineering Pty Ltd                                 |  
| PO Box 460                               Phone : 015 266 489       |
| YENDA  NSW  2681  AUSTRALIA              Fax   : 069 681 557       |
\--------------------------------------------------------------------/