From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 21 18:22:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2205ACE6; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:22:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DE92B2F; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.61.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B75F3EB6C; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:22:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9LIM8CX037694; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:22:08 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: John-Mark Gurney Subject: Re: always load aesni or load it when cpu supports it In-reply-to: <20131021164034.GU56872@funkthat.com> From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" References: <20131020070022.GP56872@funkthat.com> <423D921D-6CE5-49D9-BCED-AB14EB236800@grondar.org> <20131020161634.GQ56872@funkthat.com> <5264F074.4010607@freebsd.org> <20131021164034.GU56872@funkthat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:22:08 +0000 Message-ID: <37693.1382379728@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Andre Oppermann , Mark R V Murray , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:22:11 -0000 In message <20131021164034.GU56872@funkthat.com>, John-Mark Gurney writes: >The choice of 32 blocks (512 bytes) was arbitrary, but chosen because >it is a disk sector size... If you're doing that much AES, on a slower >machine, you'll probably want to use an accelerator... I'd say it is both arbitrary and pointless. Logical "disk-sectors" under both GBDE and GELI can be any size (think RAID-5 stripe) and consumer harddisks have 4K sectors these days. Why do you fee a limit is necessary ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.