From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 10 07:15:02 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E739116A4CF
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 07:15:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3823F43D58
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 07:15:02 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by woozle.rinet.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2AFExcj034781;
	Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:15:00 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:14:59 +0300 (MSK)
From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
To: Phil Kernick <Phil@Kernick.org>
In-Reply-To: <404A7C42.1010301@Kernick.org>
Message-ID: <20040310181358.J5807@woozle.rinet.ru>
References: <20040306130937.N71806@ganymede.hub.org>
	<20040306210515.M13247@ganymede.hub.org>
	<20040306212430.F13247@ganymede.hub.org>
	<404A7C42.1010301@Kernick.org>
X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Odd network issue ... *very* slow scp between two servers
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:15:03 -0000

On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Phil Kernick wrote:

PK> > Wow, okay, switching to 10baseT/UTP, full duplex is atrocious too:
PK> > 1038785 bytes received in 74.30 seconds (13.65 KB/s)
PK> > So, bug with full-duplex on the em devices?
PK>
PK> More likely to be a problem with the network card.

I would bet that the core of the problem is em<->swith autodetect speed/duplex
mismatch. What switch are you using, Marc?


Sincerely,
D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------