Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 15:30:20 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: bind9 vs (system)bind Message-ID: <20030411143020.GE82425@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> In-Reply-To: <20030411142053.GA324@pooh.nagual.st> References: <20030411142053.GA324@pooh.nagual.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 04:20:53PM +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> But I guess there is an option in make.conf for this to prevent the
> building of named ??
Correct.
NO_BIND= true
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks
Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE+ltF8dtESqEQa7a0RAiZ9AJ9tDBgx6aTkkiUXl3VHiK/pnZobzgCdFQI2
GRRkkeER3OBmp26hkW1pbDA=
=kk3k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030411143020.GE82425>