Date: Sun, 19 Feb 1995 19:59:21 -0800 (PST) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> To: nate@trout.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Cc: current@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: libcompat and shlib conflict Message-ID: <199502200359.TAA18198@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <199502200135.SAA29159@trout.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Feb 19, 95 06:35:40 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Umm, forgive me if this sounds silly, but does the old shared library > loader NOT complain about multiply defined symbols when it tries to > build libcompat? The reason I'm asking is that I'm attempting to bring > in the newest ld (once more) to hopefully finish off the shilb code > merge. However, the newest ld is giving me errors trying to build > libcompat (correctly so) with multiple definitions of the function > regerror(), which is defined in both libcompat/4.3/regex.c and > libcompat/regexp regerror.c. > > I suspect the older ld does not have problems, but as I'm a ways into > the test phase, I'd rather not back out the changes I've made to make > sure, but rather move forward and figure out how to resolve this > conflict. I just rebuilt it and see no errors or no warnings from the build of libcompat :-(, this is on 2.0 current as of 4:00 this afternoon :-(. > > Any hints or suggestions are welcome, Sorry :-( -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Custom computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199502200359.TAA18198>