From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 15 00:47:47 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5293016A418 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:47:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outZ.internet-mail-service.net (outZ.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8E713C468 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:47:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from mx0.idiom.com (HELO idiom.com) (216.240.32.160) by out.internet-mail-service.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:47:46 -0700 Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (nat.ironport.com [63.251.108.100]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FEC125F81; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:47:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46C24D35.7010301@elischer.org> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:47:49 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Antony Mawer References: <46C2263F.4080607@cisco.com> <46C2393B.8080508@elischer.org> <46C24761.9080608@mawer.org> In-Reply-To: <46C24761.9080608@mawer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Randall Stewart , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IP over HTTP? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:47:47 -0000 Antony Mawer wrote: > On 15/08/2007 9:22 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: >> Randall Stewart wrote: >>> Just curious.. as anyone did this on BSD? >>> >>> If so, pointers would be nice.. if not... I may (but >>> I won't go into the rant as why ;-D) >> >> hmm Are you considering a network tunnelling interface? :-) >> >> ifconfig http0 create >> ifconfig http0 remote www.freebsd.org:6667 ifconfig http0 tunnelend myend >> route add default tunnelend >> >> Hmmm actually you could probably do this with netgraph or even tunnel >> (/dev/tun) devices right? > > Isn't this the purpose of the "super tunnelling" daemon currently being > developed as a Google SoC project? > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/SuperTunnelDaemon I'm getting too old to remember everything going on in the entire world apparently.. good pointer. > > --Antony