From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 20 21:40:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CE51065670 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 21:40:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B567F8FC1A for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 21:40:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mBKLdtSe010306; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:39:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id mBKLdt8t010303; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:39:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:39:54 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <200812202039.NAA10290@lariat.net> Message-ID: <20081220223928.N10302@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <200812202039.NAA10290@lariat.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of hyperthreading in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 21:40:19 -0000 > "Netbooks" based on Intel's "Atom" microprocessor are turning into big hits > this Christmas season. The Atom, a super-low-power x86 processor, is an > "in-order" machine, which means that except for a few special cases it can > spend a lot of time waiting for data to arrive when it encounters a cache > miss. So, hyperthreading may make sense on this kind of processor as compared > to one with out-of-order execution. > > Which raises a question: What's the status of FreeBSD's support for > hyperthreading? for FreeBSD it's just like 2 processors.