Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 21:56:47 -0800 From: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@attbi.com> Cc: David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure Message-ID: <20021229215647.A79512@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20021230053810.GA79308@attbi.com>; from rodrigc@attbi.com on Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 12:38:10AM -0500 References: <200212300321.gBU3LMWB011861@bowie.private> <20021229202731.B22633@citusc.usc.edu> <20021230051705.GA5307@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20021230053810.GA79308@attbi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* De: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@attbi.com> [ Data: 2002-12-29 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure ]
> I'm not sure if your patch will solve the problem.
> The offending code is here:
> 240 if (lflag) {
> 241 char buf[32];
> 242 snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%ld-blocks", blocksize);
> 243 printf("%-13s %*s %*s\n",
> 244 "Device:",
> 245 hlen, buf,
> 246 hlen, "Used:");
> 247 }
>
>
> Doesn't the printf() statement in question have the wrong number of
> arguments?
No, it's using variable field-length specifiers.
--
Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org>
AIM: BSDFlata IRC: juli@EFnet#flata
OpenDarwin, Mono, FreeBSD Developer.
ircd-hybrid Developer, EFnet addict.
FreeBSD on MIPS-Anything on FreeBSD.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021229215647.A79512>