From owner-freebsd-current Mon Aug 30 14:46:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB7414E26 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 14:46:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id XAA25718; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 23:44:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Jonathan Lemon Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 30 Aug 1999 16:40:43 CDT." <19990830164043.11777@right.PCS> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 23:44:05 +0200 Message-ID: <25716.936049445@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <19990830164043.11777@right.PCS>, Jonathan Lemon writes: >On Aug 08, 1999 at 11:36:30PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <19990830162125.52517@right.PCS>, Jonathan Lemon writes: >> > I've just committed the revised TCP timer code. There are some >> >user visible changes: >> > >> > User visible TCP timers are now in units of the system clock >> > (10ms for the i386) >> >> Please, can we have them be in milliseconds ? > >Wouldn't this mean writing a sysctl proc for each variable, >instead of directly changing the underlying integer? I did >consider this, but wasn't sure if it would be worth the effort. Yes, you'd have to, but considering that HZ is 1024 on alpha and 100 on i386 I think it is well worth the effort... -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message