From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Jun 19 21: 5:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074F937BA0A; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 21:05:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 780D21C4D; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 00:05:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 00:05:37 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: Nate Williams Cc: Mike Smith , Jonathan Lemon , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kblob discussion. Message-ID: <20000620000537.A8523@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <20000619172041.G37084@prism.flugsvamp.com> <200006192311.QAA10064@mass.osd.bsdi.com> <200006200318.VAA15996@nomad.yogotech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200006200318.VAA15996@nomad.yogotech.com>; from nate@yogotech.com on Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 09:18:16PM -0600 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 09:18:16PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote: > However, it just so happens that recently it seems that Yahoo has been > pushing *HARD* for alot of WWW-server specific changes, that have little > usefulness outside of that specific application. I'll note that when this was discussed in October it was for another company that had a very large number of FreeBSD servers in production, and it wasn't yahoo. Two seperate large implementations needed this performance ability, my company will benefit from it as well. The power to serve, remember? -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect / Computer Horizons Corp - CVM e-mail: billf@chc-chimes.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message