From owner-cvs-all Mon Jun 3 10:38:12 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from patrocles.silby.com (d101.as15.nwbl0.wi.voyager.net [169.207.134.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4735537B403; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 10:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from patrocles.silby.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by patrocles.silby.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g53HddOA038542; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 12:39:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: from localhost (silby@localhost) by patrocles.silby.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id g53HddPT038539; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 12:39:39 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: patrocles.silby.com: silby owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 12:39:39 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack To: Robert Watson Cc: Ruslan Ermilov , , Subject: Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020603123741.G38431-100000@patrocles.silby.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Robert Watson wrote: > On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > Shouldn't you just have added the new para saying NO_WERROR is no longer > > required, specifying the date. > > > > /me tries to build snapshots without NO_WERROR > > Actually, Mr Silby's message to me suggested that my adding it was in > error -- the warnings were apparently fixed shortly before I added the > message. If that's not the case, I'll return it for historical reasons > :-). > > Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects > robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories Yes, I think you were about 18 hours late in committing that message. :) But, it's just -current, I don't think it matters too much either way whether the history of such warnings is properly preserved or not. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message