From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 16:57:06 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6C216A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:57:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ip166.usw253.dsl-acs2.sea.iinet.com
	[209.20.253.166])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DC843D2F
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:57:05 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from randy@psg.com)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ran.psg.com)
	by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD)
	id 1Ahelt-000G7o-B4; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:57:05 -0800
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
References: <E1Aha7m-000Agi-5k@ran.psg.com>
	<xzpwu7rr0wj.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<E1Ahcev-000CW5-FD@ran.psg.com>
	<xzphdyvqzhs.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<E1Ahcud-000Cyr-BE@ran.psg.com>
	<xzp8yk7qxx8.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<xzpzncnpgzy.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<xzpbrp3pfrm.fsf@dwp.des.no>
Message-Id: <E1Ahelt-000G7o-B4@ran.psg.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:57:05 -0800
cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: gaim build problem, file descriptor issue
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 00:57:06 -0000

> It isn't - I incorrectly assumed that fcntl(fd, F_DUPFD, n) is
> semantically equivalent to dup2(fd, n), but it isn't.  I'll have a
> patch committed RSN.

do we get a refund?  :-)

randy