From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 15:23:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61DF16A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 15:23:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2003F43D2D for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 15:23:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8QFLuJp066252; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:21:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:23:04 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20040926.092304.127427023.imp@bsdimp.com> To: rosti_bsd@yahoo.com From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20040926143209.44197.qmail@web14828.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040921.143546.63053469.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040926143209.44197.qmail@web14828.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new fdc(4) and new fdcontrol(8) behavior (5.3-BETA5) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 15:23:36 -0000 In message: <20040926143209.44197.qmail@web14828.mail.yahoo.com> Rostislav Krasny writes: : --- "M. Warner Losh" wrote: : > In message: <20040921122354.73480.qmail@web14827.mail.yahoo.com> : > Rostislav Krasny writes: : > : Why the 3F7h port isn't used by new fdc(4) on my system? Is it a : > : hardware detection bug? : > : > It is a minor, hardware detection bug. Your bios doesn't list it as a : > resource, but should. We do use it, but we don't allocate it with the : > bus system, which is why it doesn't appear in dmesg. A : > mostly-harmless cosmetic issue. : : How the 0x3f7 port could be used without allocation? My BIOS doesn't list : 0x3f0-0x3f1 ports as resurces of the PNP0700 device too, but fdc(4) use them : anyhow: : : PNP0700: adding dma mask 0x4 : PNP0700: adding io range 0x3f2-0x3f5, size=0x4, align=0 : PNP0700: adding irq mask 0x40 : pnpbios: handle 12 device ID PNP0700 (0007d041) : : # devinfo -uv | grep -e "0x37[0-5,7]" -e "0x3f[0-5,7]" : 0x300-0x375 (root0) : 0x377 (root0) : 0x3f0-0x3f5 (fdc0) : 0x3f7 (root0) Interesting.... Can you send me a full verbose boot? That is, the dmesg from boot -v? Warner