From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun  4 16:14:24 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557BE37B401
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Wed,  4 Jun 2003 16:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E280243F3F
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Wed,  4 Jun 2003 16:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h54NEIkA026484;
	Wed, 4 Jun 2003 17:14:18 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 17:14:09 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20030604.171409.32720803.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: dcs@newsguy.com
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <3EDE74EF.6060507@newsguy.com>
References: <200306042042.h54KgoHh007445@grimreaper.grondar.org>
	<3EDE74EF.6060507@newsguy.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: arch@freebsd.org
cc: mark@grondar.org
Subject: Re: A proposed drastic cleanup of the telnet build.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 23:14:25 -0000

In message: <3EDE74EF.6060507@newsguy.com>
            "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> writes:
: Mark Murray wrote:
: > 
: > The downside is that base telnet will depend on src/crypto/telnet,
: > so folks in dodgy countries which don't allow them to have crypto
: > source will not be able to do telnet development, and they will
: > not get a "fresh" telnet[d] after a make world.
: > 
: > Comments? I'm keen to go on this.
: 
: Err... what do you expect the people in countries that don't allow them 
: to have crypto to use? ssh?

If there are still countries where exporting crypto in a binary-only
product is illegal, then we'd need to make it possible to build the
non-crypto enabled telnet.

Warner