From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 19 12:38:08 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id MAA26545 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 19 Sep 1995 12:38:08 -0700 Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (sri.MT.net [204.94.231.129]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA26540 for ; Tue, 19 Sep 1995 12:38:05 -0700 Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id NAA25626; Tue, 19 Sep 1995 13:39:53 -0600 Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 13:39:53 -0600 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199509191939.NAA25626@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: Terry Lambert Cc: julian@ref.tfs.com (Julian Elischer), hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: why is this not a bug in namei? In-Reply-To: <199509191856.LAA10348@phaeton.artisoft.com> References: <199509190615.XAA03449@ref.tfs.com> <199509191856.LAA10348@phaeton.artisoft.com> Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Terry Lambert writes: > > ok, so we know some people don't like Terry's style.. > > ok, so what.. > > if he produces a useful piece of code we can still use it.. > > I've seen bits of core in other people's code I don't like, and people > > have taken such a dislike to my code that they've totally reformatted it.. > > ok, > > This is why 4.4BSD-Lite includes a GNU indent template. Almost, but not quite. It provides a BSD indent template in the KNF style, although as Bruce has pointed out in the past the indent.pro file doesn't do a very good job of enforcing the correct style. Nate