From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 18:02:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A7716A468 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:02:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eksffa@freebsdbrasil.com.br) Received: from capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br (capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br [201.48.151.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C297D13C442 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:02:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eksffa@freebsdbrasil.com.br) Received: (qmail 58277 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2008 14:35:39 -0300 Received: from unknown (HELO claire.bh.freebsdbrasil.com.br) (201.48.151.226) by capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br with SMTP; 19 Feb 2008 14:35:39 -0300 Message-ID: <47BB136B.8090601@freebsdbrasil.com.br> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:35:39 -0300 From: Patrick Tracanelli Organization: FreeBSD Brasil LTDA User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070612) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rui Paulo References: <20080218002216.67FEA4500F@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: traceroute AS path patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:02:22 -0000 Rui Paulo escreveu: > > On Feb 18, 2008, at 12:22 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > >>> From: Rui Paulo >>> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:25:58 +0000 >>> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org >>> >>> >>> On Feb 17, 2008, at 9:30 PM, Rui Paulo wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> The attached patch ports a traceroute functionality from FreeBSD >>>> called AS path. >>> >>> I mean, "ported from NetBSD". >> >> Is this different from the version of traceroute in ports >> (net/traceroute)? Looks functionally much the same to me, but I have >> not looked to see if the code is the same. > > I haven't tried traceroute from ports, but I think the output is different. Yes, its different. Yours is much better. I am also glad you added the -A switch functionality. Seems great to me, +1. -- Patrick Tracanelli