Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 14:04:28 +0200 From: Maurizio Vairani <maurizio.vairani@cloverinformatica.it> To: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best practice for high availability ZFS pool Message-ID: <625e2776-a97f-9ee7-a1cb-c1a053804f6c@cloverinformatica.it> In-Reply-To: <5E69742D-D2E0-437F-B4A9-A71508C370F9@FreeBSD.org> References: <5E69742D-D2E0-437F-B4A9-A71508C370F9@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Il 16/05/2016 12:08, Palle Girgensohn ha scritto: > Hi, > > We need to set up a ZFS pool with redundance. The main goal is high availability - uptime. > > I can see a few of paths to follow. > > 1. HAST + ZFS > > 2. Some sort of shared storage, two machines sharing a JBOD box. > > 3. ZFS replication (zfs snapshot + zfs send | ssh | zfs receive) Hi, have you tried compression ? Somethings like: zfs snapshot + zfs send | lzop | ssh | lzop -d | zfs receive I am successfully using this method using a modified version of sysutils/zrep , but my pools are only few TB in size. -- Maurizio
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?625e2776-a97f-9ee7-a1cb-c1a053804f6c>