From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Aug  7 12:49:00 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA03029
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 12:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.109.160])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA03022
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 12:48:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id OAA03070; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 14:46:05 -0500
From: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Message-Id: <199608071946.OAA03070@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Subject: Re: please comment on this:
To: p.richards@elsevier.co.uk (Paul Richards)
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 14:46:05 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: julian@current1.whistle.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <573f1z0yvf.fsf@elsevier.co.uk> from "Paul Richards" at Aug 7, 96 08:37:24 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com> writes:
> 
> > My goal: "virtual servers" on a grand scale..  to be able to have multiple
> > virtual machines hosted on a single physical machine that appeared to be,
> > from the net, for all intents and purposes separate machines.
> > 
> > It actually worked but I never used it for anything :-/
> 
> I set up a system like this some 12 or so months ago, it's running a
> number of "virtual machines" on a commercial basis at this very moment.

May I ask:  what exactly did you choose to do to cause it to bind each
virtual machine to a separate address?

I am mainly curious to see if you came up with a better hack than mine.

Thanks,

... JG