Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 21:14:45 +0900 (JST) From: Nakata Maho <maho.nakata@gmail.com> To: bapt@FreeBSD.org Cc: pfg@FreeBSD.org, office@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice and boost Message-ID: <20140207.211445.1197815597912358038.maho.nakata@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140207115159.GA33519@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <52E684DF.8000109@FreeBSD.org> <20140207115159.GA33519@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Boost have been updated to 1.55 > Question, is it worth still having openoffice-3 in the ports tree? No. Please remove it or I will remove it. Thanks Nakata Maho From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: OpenOffice and boost Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:51:59 +0100 > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:10:07AM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> Hello; >> >> Maho-san has updated openoffice-devel to the last version that used >> stlport internally. This is a great advance for the upstream OpenOffice >> as it means that it will start using modern STL functionality by default. >> >> In general OpenOffice now uses TR1 functionality from Boost to replace >> what libstdc++ may not have. Unfortunately this will not work in >> FreeBSD 9.x due to a bug in boost. >> >> In order to update OpenOffice further it is necessary (but probably not >> sufficient) to either update boost to version 1.55 (best) or apply >> ports/181044. >> >> I know there have been complains about the maintenance (or lack of it) >> in the openoffice ports but there are limits on to what Maho and I can >> do. It would also be great if someone works on adding staging to the >> OpenOffice ports. >> >> Best regards, > > Boost have been updated to 1.55 > Question, is it worth still having openoffice-3 in the ports tree? > > > regards, > Bapt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140207.211445.1197815597912358038.maho.nakata>