Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:24:08 +0200
From:      Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Olli Hauer <ohauer@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>, gahr@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [BRAINSTORMIG] name of the variable for passing command line options via make
Message-ID:  <5062D7C8.3060309@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <50621595.6050109@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20120924221524.GC79077@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120925114140.GP4956@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <CADLo83_cKdyPpKAzijs9w4-rFa1q1hMoPqHiSz-wgWjwvW=pOw@mail.gmail.com> <50621595.6050109@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Olli Hauer ha scritto:
>>> WITH / WITHOUT
>>
>> I thought this was a joke, but thinking about it, this is the best idea IMO.
> 
> I agree, but silently thinking OH NO! this brings us back to the discussions
> from a view months ago...
> 
> If I understand correct the LATE_(UN)SET parameter can be used inside the port
> after including bsd.port.options.mk (where I really miss it) and CMD_(UN)SET
> from the command line.

Hmm, no, I've understood that they are simply two different proposals
for the same features, i.e. command line overriding. I vote for WITH /
WITHOUT.

-- 
Alex Dupre



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5062D7C8.3060309>