Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:27:46 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Shaun T. Erickson" <ste@ste-land.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quick newbie portupgrade question. Message-ID: <20040227082745.GA15364@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <403EE178.20401@ste-land.com> References: <403EDBEB.4070904@ste-land.com> <403EDE57.3050004@daleco.biz> <403EE178.20401@ste-land.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 01:19:36AM -0500, Shaun T. Erickson wrote: > Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: >=20 > >Shaun T. Erickson wrote: > > > >>I understand that 'portupgrade -arR' will upgrade everything. Some are= =20 > >>packages and some are ports. Will portupgrade upgrade packages with=20 > >>packages, and ports with ports, or do packages get replaced with=20 > >>ports, so that all are ports after it's run? > > > >Check out the -P and -PP CLI switches > >to portupgrade(1)..... >=20 > If I read them correctly, I cannot have packages replaced with packages,= =20 > and ports with ports. That is, unless I can figure out which are which,= =20 > ahead of time, and select the right switches for the right things. Is=20 > there an easy way to determine which are which? No, see my response. Kris --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAPv+BWry0BWjoQKURAmcPAKDi7eUzKji+yLY09UXtFDzUazQT6QCfQ7KW 2wHN9OwYt/b08RI9iOKJoBs= =Z+Tx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040227082745.GA15364>