From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Mar 24 21: 2: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mail1.doit.wisc.edu (mail1.doit.wisc.edu [144.92.9.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99D814C1E for ; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 21:01:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sdqualheim@students.wisc.edu) Received: from [146.151.76.78] by mail1.doit.wisc.edu id XAA21094 (8.9.1/50); Wed, 24 Mar 1999 23:01:30 -0600 Message-ID: <36F9C352.241B5067@students.wisc.edu> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 23:02:10 -0600 From: Shaun Qualheim X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Castor Fu Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Intel 82559 ethernet supported? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I have the brand new management adaptor in my machine with this config: AMD K6/2-400 Biostar M5ALA motherboard 128 SDRAM ATI all-in-wonder vid card. etc... My pro100+ management adapter was installed on this system with 3.1-release and it works fine. I'm at 10 Mbit/Half Duplex. FBSD detects it as a pro100B, but nonetheless, it works. Shaun Qualheim University of Wisconsin College of Engineering Castor Fu wrote: > People have generally recommended the Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100B > adapter, but it looks like a new version, the > "Intel PRO/100+ management adapter" with the 82559 chip seems to be > rapidly replacing these. > > It claims to be compatible at the driver level, but has anyone > actually tested this under FreeBSD? (There are reports of problems > on netbsd, PR kern/7216) > > Thanks, > castor > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message