From owner-freebsd-hardware Tue Oct 21 00:01:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA24480 for hardware-outgoing; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 00:01:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA24442 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 00:00:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.cybercity.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA01656; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 08:59:31 +0200 (CEST) To: "Louis A. Mamakos" cc: hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PC/104 platform recommendations? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 21 Oct 1997 00:59:33 EDT." <199710210459.AAA16983@whizzo.TransSys.COM> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 08:59:31 +0200 Message-ID: <1654.877417171@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <199710210459.AAA16983@whizzo.TransSys.COM>, "Louis A. Mamakos" writ es: > >Anyone got FreeBSD running on a small (and perhaps inexpensive) PC/104 >platform? I'm thinking about an application that would require either >a 486 or Pentium with ethernet and some parallel I/O. The thing >that gives me pause looking at the glossies are how useful Flash is >on these puppies, and how "compatible" the VGA/LCD display hardware >might be.. I've got a 386sx system running on PC/104, works fine. No flash though. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."