Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 13:12:32 -0500 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Turn off PROFILE option and remove WITH_PROFILE after FreeBSD 13? Message-ID: <CAPyFy2CN1cDPHwDsUzCvYSd6FeyOb1jAEOWrfXX2N_rZFEqaEw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200117171950.GA79297@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <CAPyFy2Bk6DTYrDgkhra9xP03bJZXq5vDkD8iXbTZZGpfj3MUZA@mail.gmail.com> <20200117171950.GA79297@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 12:19, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > Why? Because adding -pg to the gfortran command line is sufficient > to getting profiling information for long running numerically > intensive codes. 'gfortran -pg', of course, loosk for libc_p.a > and libm_p.a. Have you tried sampling-based profiling (i.e., hwpmc)? I'm curious if it provides equal utility for you, or if there's some shortcoming.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2CN1cDPHwDsUzCvYSd6FeyOb1jAEOWrfXX2N_rZFEqaEw>