Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 20:26:49 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251520] x11-wm/ctwm: ctwm.1.gz orphan/missing Message-ID: <bug-251520-7788-SKQ3IMoEIC@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-251520-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-251520-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251520 --- Comment #5 from fullermd@over-yonder.net --- So, $PREFIX/man and $PREFIX/share/man should be setup by mtree, using $PORTS/Templates/bsd.local.dist. The ports framework itself only seems to = run that to setup the staging dir during the build; it doesn't seem to ever have any involvement in running it on the live system. And I don't see where poudriere ever references it at all. So, that covers how you don't have share/man. But why do you have man? In= a quick glance over the build-depends (or even just simply pkg itself, which = is a build-dep of everything anyway), they seem to have scattered various manpag= es in man/manX. So that'd bring those into being when doing the build. So, apparently poudriere _doesn't_ setup the "real" /usr/local/ in its build environments at all. I'd be inclined to view that as a bug, and I can only assume it's a recent change since this just started popping up. So I guess= we just have to force a choice in the build, since poudriere doesn't let us pr= obe the gross structure /usr/local will always have. I _assume_ from the referenced earlier changes that moved to it, that share= /man is the currently Preferred(tm) place, even though all the deps use man, and= my system has 100 meg in /usr/local/man vs 340k in /usr/local/share/man. But, whatever... The following (attachment) should jam it over that way. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251520-7788-SKQ3IMoEIC>