From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 19:06:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FD4106564A for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:06:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7298FC19 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:06:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sesu5-0004kc-08 for freebsd-x11@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:06:53 -0700 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:06:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1339614412996-5718122.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <4FD86E13.6090202@bally-wulff.de> <20120613112601.GS2337@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Intel KMS: a memory problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:06:53 -0000 32 bit systems being faster (for Windows desktop usually!) than 64 was quite a bit time ago. Also, even then 64 bit ones were faster where it could be utilised. Umm... Please do not be offended, but all basics are here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit#Pros_and_cons -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Intel-KMS-a-memory-problem-tp5718027p5718122.html Sent from the freebsd-x11 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.