From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 14 03:44:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90BFA16A400 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 03:44:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7052113C46A for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 03:44:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 0D926AC5; Sun, 13 May 2007 22:44:28 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 22:44:27 -0500 To: Steve Kargl Message-ID: <20070514034427.GA31264@soaustin.net> References: <20070513183009.GA96018@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <86646wzfv0.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070513192836.GA94258@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <46478626.9060301@FreeBSD.org> <20070513225255.GA96773@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20070513230634.GA96931@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <6eb82e0705131931j4274046ew588ba5f28c0930e2@mail.gmail.com> <20070514025129.GB197@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <6eb82e0705132011r6bad8de6qb38eb6e6bcb4beb0@mail.gmail.com> <20070514031852.GA634@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070514031852.GA634@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 14 May 2007 04:30:55 +0000 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Rong-en Fan Subject: Re: Process for requesting reverting patch? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 03:44:28 -0000 On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 08:18:52PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > For any one that thinks I'm some kind of idiot. I've > used the base system gdb for the past 3 years to debug gcc. I don't think it's that; but the communication problem with the committer (hopefully now resolved!) and the fact that other people aren't seeing this problem, means that it is something specific to the setup on your one computer. As one of the bugmeisters, I know how frustrating it can be to see problems get reported and not see a quick response; but OTOH, I think you can understand the frustration of anyone who has looked at this bug report and said "gee, works for me". I'll take this opportunity to soapbox; please, folks, when following up to bug reports, Cc: bug-followup@ and not freebsd-bugs@; the former will get the information into GNATS and the latter won't. (In either case the posting will make it to freebsd-bugs@). I think this might have helped in this case. mcl