From owner-freebsd-doc Sat Jul 3 5: 7:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C81B14E27; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 05:07:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mpp@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from mpp@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id FAA66872; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 05:07:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mpp@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 05:07:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Message-Id: <199907031207.FAA66872@freefall.freebsd.org> To: jmonroy@email.com, mpp@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/12493: listing of (33) utilities in /bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin without man(1) information Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: listing of (33) utilities in /bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin without man(1) information State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: mpp State-Changed-When: Sat Jul 3 04:51:19 PDT 1999 State-Changed-Why: Pretty much a duplicate of docs/12486. In the future, if additional information has been found after the initial PR, reply to the verification message that GNATS sent you. That way the new info is recorded by GNATS, and no one has to review the new PR to determine if it is a new problem or just a re-hash of a previous PR. Now, I am already working on this, as I have stated in at least 2 (maybe 3) other e-mails, please do not submit any new problem reports about this. If you find other utilities that are without man pages, please refer back to PR docs/12486. In a perfect world, I would liek every binary in the standard search path to have a man page that shows up with "whatis" or "apropose", but I don't think that will haopen (perl being one of the major problems here). So until then, please just follow-ups to the orignal PR so I (or anyone else interested in the problem) can keep it all straight. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message