From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Jan  9 09:00:21 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id JAA09877
          for ports-outgoing; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 09:00:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id JAA09867
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 09:00:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] 
	by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 0.56 #1)
	id E0viNpN-0005AH-00; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 09:59:41 -0700
To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Subject: Re: Niklas Hallqvist: archivers/hpack.non-usa.only 
Cc: m230761@ingenieria.ingsala.unal.edu.co, ache@nagual.ru, ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 08 Jan 1997 16:24:36 PST."
		<199701090024.QAA02525@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> 
References: <199701090024.QAA02525@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>  
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 1997 09:59:41 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Message-Id: <E0viNpN-0005AH-00@rover.village.org>
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <199701090024.QAA02525@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Satoshi
Asami writes: 
: On the contrary, Warner, on the contrary.  This is a lot of work to
: do, and by doing this, we are going to send a clear message that
: OpenBSD is welcome to share the ports tree with us.

OK.  Put that way, I agree.  I guess I'm a little bit jumpy in this
area and might be a little bit quick to take offence, or think others
will.  I forgot to look at the bigger picture :-)

: As long as we don't change clearly FreeBSD-centric things to use BSD,
: I would think most of the ports tree will be happily compilable on
: OpenBSD too.

Yes.  That's true.  I'm worried that any bulk, unthinking change would
cause that to happen.

Warner