From owner-freebsd-security Tue Jan 2 6:59:43 2001 From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 2 06:59:41 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.via-net-works.net.ar (ns1.via-net-works.net.ar [200.10.100.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B376737B402 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2001 06:59:39 -0800 (PST) Received: (from fpscha@localhost) by ns1.via-net-works.net.ar (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA18599; Tue, 2 Jan 2001 12:00:20 -0300 (ART) From: Fernando Schapachnik Message-Id: <200101021500.MAA18599@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar> Subject: Re: Proposed modification to ftpd In-Reply-To: "from Roman Shterenzon at Jan 1, 2001 10:05:33 am" To: Roman Shterenzon Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 12:00:20 -0300 (ART) Cc: Warner Losh , security@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: Fernando Schapachnik X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL82 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org En un mensaje anterior, Roman Shterenzon escribió: > On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > > > While the syntax is ugly, I agree that it would be useful to have in > > our ftpd. > > > > In the little consulting I did, this was a huge, huge, huge requested > > feature. > > > > While we could invent yet another syntax, it would likely be better to > > use a slightly ugly, widely deployed syntax that people are familiar > > with than a less ugly one they would be more inclined to make a > > mistake with and have a false sense of security. > Perhaps it's possible to leave the delimeter as an option, which defaults > to "/./"? Or I'm missing the point? In the patch I made "/./" is an easely changeable #define. Regards. Fernando P. Schapachnik Administración de la red VIA NET.WORKS ARGENTINA S.A. fschapachnik@vianetworks.com.ar Conmutador: (54-11) 4323-3333 - Soporte: 0810-333-AYUDA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message