Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:37:56 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Achilleus Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Just a ports related question Message-ID: <20060602143756.GB66066@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0606021635080.3247-100000@matrix.gatewaynet.com> References: <20060602132009.GC5765@soaustin.net> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0606021635080.3247-100000@matrix.gatewaynet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--V0207lvV8h4k8FAm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 04:42:28PM +0300, Achilleus Mantzios wrote: > Anyway, since the tag for ports is ".", (and it is a substantial > property of the ports system, i.e. not following RELEASES and branches, > but evolving on their own), would not it make more sense to arrange > for packages in=20 > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-release/ > to progressively match those of > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.1-stable? Please give us about 30 new i386/amd64/sparc64/ia64 machines first, thanks :-) Kris --V0207lvV8h4k8FAm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEgE1EWry0BWjoQKURApl3AKCWdhglCY9CkIEhvQ7Up0xrBlE8XgCfXaEp NCUE4CHQKqNGLR+cis2pHXA= =d6U3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --V0207lvV8h4k8FAm--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060602143756.GB66066>