From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Aug 5 17:26:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C86E9B348C for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:26:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hiren@strugglingcoder.info) Received: from mail.strugglingcoder.info (strugglingcoder.info [65.19.130.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B5391AF0; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:26:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hiren@strugglingcoder.info) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.1.1.3]) (Authenticated sender: hiren@strugglingcoder.info) by mail.strugglingcoder.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDBA8D3F37; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:26:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:26:43 -0700 From: hiren panchasara To: John-Mark Gurney Cc: Kubilay Kocak , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bugzilla chatter? Message-ID: <20150805172643.GB1531@strugglingcoder.info> References: <55C14723.8010601@swin.edu.au> <55C22593.1030109@ignoranthack.me> <55C2281B.3080704@FreeBSD.org> <20150805160809.GU78154@funkthat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wxDdMuZNg1r63Hyj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150805160809.GU78154@funkthat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 17:26:45 -0000 --wxDdMuZNg1r63Hyj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/05/15 at 09:08P, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Kubilay Kocak wrote this message on Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 01:13 +1000: > > Perhaps a net-bugs or similar? I agree to the idea of keeping lists like this bugzilla-spam free. >=20 > I both like this idea and don't like this idea... I understand part > of the point to pointing them at the public list is to gain more > exposure to the bugs, Which is also really important. Like the work by Sean that caused this discussion is extremely useful. Many tickets/issues in Intel drivers got attention/resolved because of that. >=20 > I have a feeling that most people on the list can't or don't want to > deal with it, and by moving it to a different list, the people who > can and will do something about it can subscribe, the problem is > getting those people subscribed... If we don't get enough people > subscribed, then there isn't much point... Well said and totally agree but that seems like the only way to keep this list sane/readable. >=20 > btw, if this works, we should do it for all the main categories.. Yeah, we can start with this one list and see how it goes. Cheers, Hiren --wxDdMuZNg1r63Hyj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJVwkdTXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRBNEUyMEZBMUQ4Nzg4RjNGMTdFNjZGMDI4 QjkyNTBFMTU2M0VERkU1AAoJEIuSUOFWPt/lgmQH/1EMLfqVJto61QfCdwJ8kqOl Pi+VCCRPzQZ6VbSlVIfJv8cVpChhv+8LY3zpDFXD8jma97CLtEEr+OAFR/Y8zrsR l9RGdlH6fqoRLCqqQ5vBi8Dlbk24yLOd+lZatIm73oYvC/lFO9RuTh9UfxQAUyN6 ZvtTvxcNYmpFx9AwlC2N2yC5XhWML9BI0aIBF7L0avEvZrfFq34PCWSUqmKj6dDI 4aOhhdGPG6U5oCjkwP1Djl7uYWekPDWo5AnZFRWDS0qb7rtQHjX6WVgFp4rDsBN/ 5FEy54s3qwPlJretOslzcgitJD/QlzY1U0oED6hMQi21lIIAGcLc3Xh/6nh9P2A= =bNIb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wxDdMuZNg1r63Hyj--