From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 19 08:25:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4FF106566C for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:25:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047EE8FC13 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:25:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id n2J8CTQM070006 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:12:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id n2J8CT6V070005; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:12:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA26074; Thu, 19 Mar 09 00:07:22 PST Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:06:28 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: rizzo@iet.unipi.it, gary.jennejohn@freenet.de Message-Id: <49c1fd04.Ul73kIip/JpE7k7C%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <49C00745.1050607@telus.net> <20090318001138.GF95451@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090318113023.7bc51ef4@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20090318113023.7bc51ef4@ernst.jennejohn.org> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, 1cynthia2flynn3@telus.net Subject: mtools vs X11 (Re: FreeBSD Port: syslinux-3.72) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:25:53 -0000 Gary Jennejohn wrote: > Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > ... Cynthia Flynn wrote: > [snip - syslinux pulls in too much X11 stuff] > > I think the extra dependencies that you find listed for syslinux: > > [snip] > > come directly from mtools ... > > Yeah. It looks like mtools uses X11 by default, which IMHO is > incorrect. Instead it should have an option to turn X11 _on_, > rather than one for turning it _off_, as it currently does. IMO it is a POLA violation for mtools to depend on X11 *at all*. Instead of having an option, maybe the port should be split so that mtools itself just provides the code to access FAT filesystems, and (say) mtools-gui does the fancy display stuff.