From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 24 14:14:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DB1106564A for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:14:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from kabab.cs.huji.ac.il (kabab.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9298F8FC13 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by kabab.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1QOsMz-00028p-LN; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:14:01 +0300 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Matthew Jacob In-reply-to: <4DDBB3F7.20303@feral.com> References: <4DDBB3F7.20303@feral.com> Comments: In-reply-to Matthew Jacob message dated "Tue, 24 May 2011 06:34:47 -0700." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:14:01 +0300 From: Daniel Braniss Message-ID: Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iscsi_initiator and tag opening problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 14:14:04 -0000 > First of all, the target is broken here, but okay. yeh, but 'it works with MS' :-( the first one with the problem was iscilon, but today, something similar i'm seeing with IBM storewiz. > > Secondly, you, as the entity forming up PDUs and BHS entities can put > whatever tag you want in it, no? > The DA driver uses an ordered tag every now and then (foolishly- there's > a sysctl to turn that off). > it's a CAM thing not PDU/BHS, or at least that is my undertanding. myabe it's time to read the RFC again > On 5/24/2011 5:00 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm having problems with particular iscsi-targets, which when increasing > > the tag opening above 1, will crash the target. The developers are > > saying that they do suport tagged queuing, but > > > > 'do not support task-set management (which is what initiator side > > attempts at controlling target side execution ordering is called)' > > > > So, since I'm the iscsi_initiator developer, is there any way that I can tell > > the CAM to keep it SIMPLE as opposed to ORDERED? > > Sorry, my knowledge of ISCSI stopped at version 2 :-) > > > > thanks, > > danny > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-scsi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-scsi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >