Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 06 Nov 2011 16:20:43 +0200
From:      Mikolaj Golub <trociny@freebsd.org>
To:        Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: "ps -e" without procfs(5)
Message-ID:  <86aa89nxhg.fsf@kopusha.home.net>
In-Reply-To: <20111105135801.GT50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> (Kostik Belousov's message of "Sat, 5 Nov 2011 15:58:01 %2B0200")
References:  <86y5wkeuw9.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20111016171005.GB50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <86aa8qozyx.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20111025082451.GO50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <86aa8k2im0.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20111031094948.GB50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <86vcr21agm.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20111105135801.GT50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 15:58:01 +0200 Kostik Belousov wrote:

 KB> procfs_doproccmdline() can benefit from your work.

Patch for procfs:

http://people.freebsd.org/~trociny/procfs.patch

-- 
Mikolaj Golub



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86aa89nxhg.fsf>