Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Jul 2000 23:13:54 -0700 (PDT)
From:      brooks@one-eyed-alien.net
To:        FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject:   docs/20009: [PATCH] the FAQ needs an entry on bikesheds
Message-ID:  <200007180613.XAA10468@minya.>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>Number:         20009
>Category:       docs
>Synopsis:       [PATCH] the FAQ needs an entry on bikesheds
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-doc
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          doc-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Jul 18 09:40:01 PDT 2000
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Brooks Davis
>Release:        FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386
>Organization:
>Environment:

>Description:

People are confused by all the refrences on hackers, etc. to the color
of bikesheds.  There should be a FAQ about this.

>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:

Apply this patch in the faq directory and add a man entity for sleep(1).
Hopefully, this doesn't contain too many DocBook style errors.  I think
I recal Nik saying that patches should follow the style guide not the
status quo in the FAQ.

Index: book.sgml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/doc/en_US.ISO_8859-1/books/faq/book.sgml,v
retrieving revision 1.70
diff -u -r1.70 book.sgml
--- book.sgml	2000/07/11 21:36:22	1.70
+++ book.sgml	2000/07/18 05:50:06
@@ -8782,6 +8782,85 @@
 
 </answer></qandaentry>
 
+      <qandaentry>
+	<question>
+	  <para>Why should I care what color the bikeshed is?</para>
+	</question>
+
+	<answer>
+	  <para>The really, really short answer is that you shouldn't.
+	    The somewhat longer answer is that just because you are
+	    capable of building a bikeshed doesn't mean you should stop
+	    others from building one just because you don't like the
+	    color they plan to paint it.  This is a metaphor indicating
+	    that you need not argue about every little feature just
+	    because you know enough to do so.  Some people have
+	    commented that the amount of noise generated by a change is
+	    inversely proportional to the complexity of the
+	    change.</para>
+
+	  <para>The longer and more complete answer is that after a very
+	    long argument about whether &man.sleep.1; should take
+	    fractional second arguments, Poul-Henning Kamp posted a long
+	    message entitled <quote><ulink url="http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=506636+517178+/usr/local/www/db/text/1999/freebsd-hackers/19991003.freebsd-hackers">A
+	    bike shed (any colour will do) on greener
+	    grass...</ulink></quote>.  The appropriate portions of that
+	    message are quoted below.</para>
+
+
+	  <blockquote>
+	    <title>Excerpts from <quote>A bike shed (any colour will do) on
+	      greener grass...</quote></title>
+
+	    <attribution>Poul-Henning Kamp on freebsd-hackers, October
+	      2, 1999</attribution>
+
+	    <para>"What is it about this bike shed ?" Some of you have
+	      asked me.</para>
+
+	    <para> It's a long story, or rather it's an old story, but
+	      it is quite short actually.  C. Northcote Parkinson wrote
+	      a book in the early 1960'ies, called "Parkinson's Law",
+	      which contains a lot of insight into the dynamics of
+	      management.</para>
+
+	    <para>[snip a bit of commentary on the book]</para>
+
+	    <para>In the specific example involving the bike shed, the
+	      other vital component is an atomic power-plant, I guess
+	      that illustrates the age of the book.</para>
+
+	    <para>Parkinson shows how you can go in to the board of
+	      directors and get approval for building a multi-million or
+	      even billion dollar atomic power plant, but if you want to
+	      build a bike shed you will be tangled up in endless
+	      discussions.</para>
+
+	    <para>Parkinson explains that this is because an atomic
+	      plant is so vast, so expensive and so complicated that
+	      people cannot grasp it, and rather than try, they fall
+	      back on the assumption that somebody else checked all the
+	      details before it got this far.   Richard P. Feynmann
+	      gives a couple of interesting, and very much to the point,
+	      examples relating to Los Alamos in his books.</para>
+
+	    <para>A bike shed on the other hand.  Anyone can build one
+	      of those over a weekend, and still have time to watch the
+	      game on TV.  So no matter how well prepared, no matter how
+	      reasonable you are with your proposal, somebody will seize
+	      the chance to show that he is doing his job, that he is
+	      paying attention, that he is *here*.</para>
+
+	    <para>In Denmark we call it "setting your fingerprint".  It
+	      is about personal pride and prestige, it is about being
+	      able to point somewhere and say "There!  *I* did that."
+	      It is a strong trait in politicians, but present in most
+	      people given the chance.  Just think about footsteps in
+	      wet cement.</para>
+	  </blockquote>
+	</answer>
+      </qandaentry>
+
 <qandaentry><question>
 <para>How many FreeBSD hackers does it take to change a lightbulb?</para></question><answer>
 


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007180613.XAA10468>