From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 23 14:38:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E0E106564A; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 14:38:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from thyme.infocus-llc.com (server.infocus-llc.com [206.156.254.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A648FC13; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 14:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-64-226-141.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.64.226.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by thyme.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1DAE37B4BC; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 09:38:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 0575961C42; Sat, 23 Apr 2011 09:38:39 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 09:38:39 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Jeremy Chadwick Message-ID: <20110423143838.GR91591@over-yonder.net> References: <926783796.20110423022501@nitronet.pl> <20110423005422.GQ91591@over-yonder.net> <2910134705.20110423090442@nitronet.pl> <20110423125247.GA89102@icarus.home.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110423125247.GA89102@icarus.home.lan> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21-fullermd.4 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at thyme.infocus-llc.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Pawel Tyll , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, pjd@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildworld FAIL. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 14:38:41 -0000 On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 05:52:47AM -0700 I heard the voice of Jeremy Chadwick, and lo! it spake thus: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 09:04:42AM +0200, Pawel Tyll wrote: > > So was NO_OPENSSL deprecated or something? > > I think he's implying that hast indirectly relies upon OpenSSL. There's some conditionalization on MK_OPENSSL in the Makefile (and via that, in the code), but it's incomplete. Whether that means it _should_ be buildable without OpenSSL and is just insufficiently tested, or whether it really just flat needs OpenSSL and the conditionalization is vestigial, I don't know. pjd@ cc'd. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.