Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 09:38:39 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> To: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Cc: Pawel Tyll <ptyll@nitronet.pl>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, pjd@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildworld FAIL. Message-ID: <20110423143838.GR91591@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <20110423125247.GA89102@icarus.home.lan> References: <926783796.20110423022501@nitronet.pl> <20110423005422.GQ91591@over-yonder.net> <2910134705.20110423090442@nitronet.pl> <20110423125247.GA89102@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 05:52:47AM -0700 I heard the voice of Jeremy Chadwick, and lo! it spake thus: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 09:04:42AM +0200, Pawel Tyll wrote: > > So was NO_OPENSSL deprecated or something? > > I think he's implying that hast indirectly relies upon OpenSSL. There's some conditionalization on MK_OPENSSL in the Makefile (and via that, in the code), but it's incomplete. Whether that means it _should_ be buildable without OpenSSL and is just insufficiently tested, or whether it really just flat needs OpenSSL and the conditionalization is vestigial, I don't know. pjd@ cc'd. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110423143838.GR91591>