From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 16:23:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA99106564A for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:23:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@lispworks.com) Received: from lwfs1-cam.cam.lispworks.com (mail.lispworks.com [193.34.186.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319E18FC18 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from higson.cam.lispworks.com (higson.cam.lispworks.com [192.168.1.7]) by lwfs1-cam.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7UGNj4M070982; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:23:45 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from martin@lispworks.com) Received: from higson.cam.lispworks.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by higson.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.4) id q7UGNiDP006231; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:23:44 +0100 Received: (from martin@localhost) by higson.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q7UGNiEr006228; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:23:44 +0100 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:23:44 +0100 Message-Id: <201208301623.q7UGNiEr006228@higson.cam.lispworks.com> From: Martin Simmons To: Bob Friesenhahn In-reply-to: (message from Bob Friesenhahn on Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:15:39 -0500 (CDT)) References: <201208281813.q7SIDEiJ000779@higson.cam.lispworks.com> <201208291053.q7TArlAs000409@higson.cam.lispworks.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using AMD with NFS Mounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:23:54 -0000 >>>>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:15:39 -0500 (CDT), Bob Friesenhahn said: > > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, Tim Gustafson wrote: > > > > Not having autofs on FreeBSD is a real thorn in my side. I'm trying > > to get FreeBSD implemented more at UCSC, and specifically the School > > of Engineering, as a large-volume file server, and the lack of a > > proper auto-mounter that works the same way (or at least close enough) > > as all our other systems is a huge roadblock. > > I agree. I don't understand the relationship between FreeBSD and AMD > (am-utils). FreeBSD barely admits to having AMD and does not provide > any documentation for it. Hmm, there is an example of AMD in the FreeBSD Handbook and extensive documentation via man pages and info pages. > > I'm not much of a kernel hacker, otherwise I might attempt this > > myself, but it seems like this can't possibly be that hard, especially > > since it's implemented in Linux, which is GPL'd and therefore open to > > porting. > > It would be more reasonable to re-use the Sun automounter code from > Illumos which should be under CDDL license like zfs. The Sun > automounter code is more mature than Linux automounter and has fewer > missing features and fewer bugs. I would miss AMD things like type:=link and normalize_hostnames for preventing duplicate mounts of the same resource. __Martin