Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 12:37:43 +0200 From: Franz Klammer <klammer@webonaut.com> To: Joe Kelsey <joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox vs. mozilla Message-ID: <40A1FE77.2050606@webonaut.com> In-Reply-To: <1084339014.58028.429.camel@zircon> References: <1084295052.58028.356.camel@zircon> <40A1116E.5050009@webonaut.com> <1084339014.58028.429.camel@zircon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joe Kelsey wrote: >On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 10:46, Franz Klammer wrote: > > >>for that issue i wrote me a small script (based on the code from the bottom >>of /usr/X11R6/bin/mozilla). use it instead of the firebird command. >> >> > >So, why doesn't this exist in the standard firefox? Do the mozilla >developers know and they don't want to do this? Do we need to put a >FreeBSD patch in the port? > > > good question ... don't know ... but i believe that the firebird developer aware of it and have a reason why they don't add it. the only way to find it out is to search the bugzilla database or open a bug if you find nothing. i don't think it's a good idea to add a FreeBSD patch unless there are OS-specific problems to solve. in my opinion a better solution is to make this script available as separate port e.g.: www/firefox-remote. of course - there are also the possibility to rename bin/firefox to bin/firefox.sh and install such a wrapper-script as bin/firefox question to the list: should i make a port for www/firefox-remote or not? franz. >/Joe > > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40A1FE77.2050606>